LBO Builder
Investment Banking
← All tools
Precision 0.0
LBO Simulator — Phase 4 · Complete

Leveraged Buyout Engine

Built around Prof. de Groot's two-direction framework — Forward (entry multiple → IRR) and Backward (target IRR → max bid). Sources & Uses, debt waterfall, cash sweep, and sensitivity tables — built from first principles, no Excel functions.

Ph 1 — Cash Flows ✓ Ph 2 — Debt & Returns ✓ Ph 3 — Sensitivity & Mini Lab ✓ Ph 4 — Excel Export ✓
How This Model Works This simulator builds a Leveraged Buyout valuation from first principles, following Prof. de Groot's methodology. Unlike a DCF (which produces an intrinsic value) or comparable companies analysis (which produces a market-based value), the LBO produces a floor valuation — the maximum price a financial sponsor can pay while still meeting a target IRR. The model runs in two directions: traditional (input multiple → output IRR) and de Groot's signature valuation framing (input target IRR → output maximum bid). Both produce results in EV and per-share space.
Mode A — Forward (Traditional)
You input: entry multiple, financing structure, exit multiple, cash flows.
Model outputs: IRR, MOIC, implied exit share price.
Use case: "What return does this deal produce at the announced price?"
Mode B — Backward (de Groot Valuation)
You input: target IRR, exit multiple, financing structure, cash flows.
Model outputs: maximum entry EV, maximum offer price per share.
Use case: "What's the most we can pay and still hit 15% IRR?"
How to Use — Step by Step Tab 1 — Cash Flows: Set base year EBITDA and hold period (3–10 yrs). Choose Build mode to project EBITDA from a growth path with UFCF drivers, or Paste mode to drop in UFCF directly from a DCF model. Operating Scenario presets (Base / Sponsor / Management / Downside-1 / Downside-2) follow R&P 3E conventions.

Tab 2 — Sources & Uses: Offer price per share, basic + dilutive shares, existing net debt → Equity Purchase Price → Entry EV. Pick a Financing Structure preset (1–5) covering TLB-heavy through Sub-Notes-heavy capital structures, or customize tranches manually.

Tab 3 — Debt Schedule: Annual waterfall — EBITDA → cash interest per tranche → mandatory amortization → levered FCF → 100% cash sweep to TLB. DSCR and Interest Coverage trajectory included.

Tab 4 — Returns: Forward / Backward toggle. IRR, MOIC, Equity Value Bridge (Entry Equity + EBITDA Growth + Debt Paydown = Exit Equity). Output in both EV and per-share space.

Tab 5 — Sensitivity: Three traffic-light heatmaps — IRR(Entry × Exit), MOIC(Entry × Exit), and IRR(Entry × Exit Year) for rolling-exit analysis. Display toggle: EV / Equity / $ per share.

Tab 6 — Export: Six-sheet Excel workbook (Cover, Assumptions, Sources & Uses, Debt Schedule, Returns, Sensitivity) matching Unilever Foods structure.

Tab 7 — Mini Lab: The "why it works" foundational lesson — four canonical scenarios (debt paydown / EV growth / 25% leverage / 75% leverage) with interactive sliders showing how leverage amplifies equity returns.
Exam Notes No Excel functions allowed in coursework — IRR is computed via Newton-Raphson iteration, not =IRR(). Cash sweep is 100% of levered FCF to the senior TLB until it's repaid; only then does cash accumulate on the balance sheet. Mandatory amortization (typically 1% of original TLB principal per year) runs before the optional sweep. Strategic / IG-adjacent buyers use lower coupons (4–5%); PE sponsors face SOFR+250bps or wider (7–8%+). The Mezzanine / PIK tranche is unique to PE sponsor structures — strategic buyers typically don't need it.
Simulator Complete All eight tabs are now functional. Tabs 0–5 cover the full build workflow (Guide → Cash Flows → Sources & Uses → Debt Schedule → Returns → Sensitivity). Tab 6 exports a 6-sheet Excel workbook (Cover, Assumptions, Sources & Uses, Debt Schedule, Returns, Sensitivity) with blue inputs / black outputs / gold section headers per industry color-coding conventions. Tab 7 (Mini Lab) is the pedagogical closer with four canonical scenarios.

Section 1 — Deal Anchors

Base year EBITDA and hold period drive the entire projection horizon. Hold period determines which projection year is the exit year for IRR / MOIC.
$M
5 yrs
FY2025= Base Year
FY2030= Base Year + Hold

Section 2 — Cash Flow Input Mode

Choose Build from EBITDA to project from a growth path and UFCF drivers, or Paste UFCF to drop in UFCF figures directly (e.g. from a completed DCF model).
—
Yr 1Yr 2Yr 3Yr 4Yr 5Yr 6Yr 7Yr 8Yr 9Yr 10
Switch any year to Direct $M to override growth-driven projection with an explicit analyst estimate.
Yr 1Yr 2Yr 3Yr 4Yr 5Yr 6Yr 7Yr 8Yr 9Yr 10
%
Tax is applied to EBIT (EBITDA − D&A) to derive NOPAT, then D&A added back, Capex and ΔNWC subtracted to arrive at UFCF.

Cash Flow Preview

EBITDA path, UFCF path, and exit-year metrics derived from the inputs above. These feed Tabs 2–5.
—
EBITDA Entry
—
EBITDA Exit
—
EBITDA CAGR
—
Σ UFCF (hold period)

Section 1 — Buyer Type & Entry Valuation

Switch between PE Sponsor (LBO-style, higher leverage + Mezz/PIK enabled) and Strategic / IG-adjacent buyer (lower leverage, no PIK, IG coupons).
—
x
—= Entry Mult × EBITDA0
$
M
M
—= Basic + Dilutive
—= Offer × FDSO
EV ↔ Per-Share Reconciliation Entry EV and Offer/Share are linked: Entry EV = Offer × FDSO + Existing Net Debt. Edit either and the other will update to keep them in sync (last-edit wins). The model uses Entry EV as the canonical source of truth internally.
$M
$M
—= Gross Debt − Cash

Section 2 — Financing Structure

Choose a preset structure or customize the tranche mix manually. Total Debt = sum of tranches; Equity Cheque is the plug.
Manual entry — values not overwritten by preset
x
%
%
—= TLB Mult × EBITDA0
x
%
—= Sr Unsec Mult × EBITDA0
x
%
—= Mezz Mult × EBITDA0
%
%
$M
$M

Sources & Uses Balance

Sources must equal Uses. Equity Cheque is the residual plug. A green check means the deal balances; red means recheck inputs.
Sources of Funds
Uses of Funds
—
Entry EV
—
Total Debt
—
Gross Leverage
—
Equity Cheque

Annual Debt Schedule & Cash Flow Waterfall

EBITDA → UFCF (from Tab 1) → minus cash interest (per tranche) → minus mandatory amort → levered FCF → 100% cash sweep to TLB. Ending balances per tranche. Years beyond hold period are dimmed.
—
Debt at Entry
—
Debt at Exit
—
Total Paydown
—
Exit Leverage
Waterfall Mechanics Step 1: UFCF (from Tab 1 cash flow projection) is the source of debt repayment.
Step 2: Cash interest deducted — computed on each tranche's beginning balance for the year. PIK interest (if Mezz on) accrues to balance, no cash impact.
Step 3: Mandatory amort on TLB (typically 1% of original principal per year) deducted.
Step 4: Levered FCF = UFCF − cash interest − mandatory amort.
Step 5: 100% cash sweep applied to TLB until repaid in full. If sweep capacity exceeds remaining TLB, excess is held as cash on the balance sheet (rare in well-structured LBOs).
Step 6: Sr Unsec and Mezz are bullets — balances unchanged until exit (except Mezz balance grows from PIK accrual).

Section 1 — Calculation Mode

Forward: input entry multiple, output IRR. Backward (de Groot signature): input target IRR, output max entry multiple & max offer price.
x
—yrs

Section 2 — Returns Summary

All metrics computed at exit year (entry + hold). MOIC = Equity Out / Equity In; IRR computed via Newton-Raphson iteration (no Excel functions).
—
IRR
—
MOIC
—
Exit EV
—
Exit Equity
—
Implied Exit Share Price
—
Share Price Multiple
—
Equity at Entry
—
Debt Paydown

Section 3 — Equity Value Bridge

Decomposes equity return into three drivers: EBITDA growth (operational), multiple expansion (re-rating), and debt paydown (financial engineering). The classic LBO returns attribution.
Driver$M% of Exit Equity

Section 1 — Sensitivity Configuration

Three traffic-light heatmaps stress-test the LBO across pricing and timing assumptions. Grids re-center on the current base case (Entry & Exit multiples from Tabs 2 and 4). Target IRR threshold marks the "feasible bid" boundary.
%
x
x
How to Read These Tables Base case (current Entry × Exit) is marked with a heavy navy border. Color gradient runs red → orange → yellow → green from lowest to highest value in each table. Target IRR line: cells at or above the threshold (Section 1 input) carry a small ☆ marker — these represent feasible bids from a PE sponsor's perspective. In the third table (Entry × Exit Year), each column tests a different exit timing — useful for understanding how the IRR/MOIC trade-off depends on hold period.
Table 1 — IRR  |  Entry × Exit Multiple Hold fixed at 5 yrs
 Low → High IRR
☆ ≥ Target IRR  |  Border = base case
Table 2 — MOIC  |  Entry × Exit Multiple Hold fixed at 5 yrs
 Low → High MOIC
☆ ≥ 2.0x MOIC  |  Border = base case
Table 3 — IRR  |  Entry × Exit Year Exit multiple fixed at 10.0x
 Low → High IRR by exit timing
☆ ≥ Target IRR  |  Border = base case
Reading Timing Sensitivity (Table 3) Earlier exits (Years 3–4) typically show higher IRRs but lower MOICs — you're compounding return over fewer years on less debt paydown. Later exits (Years 7–10) show diminishing IRRs as the high-return early years get diluted by lower marginal-return later years. The "sweet spot" for PE sponsor exits is usually Years 4–6.

Excel Workbook Export

Generates a six-sheet Excel workbook with the full LBO build at the current state of inputs. Follows industry color-coding conventions and matches the Unilever Foods reference structure.
Workbook Contents
1
Cover
Deal summary header · current LBO output (Entry EV, Equity, IRR, MOIC) · buyer type and hold period
2
Assumptions
Base year, EBITDA path with growth/direct mode flags, UFCF drivers (D&A, Capex, ΔNWC by year), tax rate, hold, operating scenario preset
3
Sources & Uses
Side-by-side balance · offer price & FDSO · tranche sizes (TLB, Sr Unsec, optional Mezz) · fees, tender premiums, cash on hand
4
Debt Schedule
Annual waterfall: EBITDA → UFCF → cash interest by tranche → mandatory amort → levered FCF → 100% cash sweep → ending balances → leverage / DSCR / coverage
5
Returns
Forward mode summary (IRR, MOIC, equity bridge) · Backward mode (if active): max entry mult, max offer/share, premium vs current
6
Sensitivity
Three traffic-light tables: IRR(Entry × Exit), MOIC(Entry × Exit), IRR(Entry × Exit Year) — base case marked, color-coded cells
Color-coding Convention Blue = hard-coded inputs (analyst-editable). Black = formulas / computed outputs. Gold = section headers. Green = positive output highlight (IRR, MOIC). Red = negative values. Sensitivity tables retain their traffic-light gradient.
Exam Note Prof. de Groot's exam (Session 15) prohibits AI use and Excel financial functions. The exported workbook contains the output values computed by this tool's manual Newton-Raphson and binary-search engines — not formulas. For exam preparation, use this workbook as a check-figure reference: build your own workbook from scratch and verify your numbers against these. The structure of this workbook (sheets, layout, columns) mirrors how an answer should look on paper.
Mini Lab — Why LBO Returns Work The four canonical scenarios below are drawn from the 2012 Economics of LBO foundation. They isolate the two mechanisms by which leverage produces equity returns: debt repayment (Scenario I) and enterprise value growth (Scenario II). The surprising result — both produce identical IRRs (24.6%). Scenarios III & IV then introduce leverage variation, showing how the same operational performance ($500 EV growth) produces a 13.4-IRR-point spread between 25% debt and 75% debt structures. This is the "wax on, wax off" foundational lesson before tackling the full Unilever model.

Interactive Sandbox

Click a scenario card above to load its parameters, then experiment with the sliders below. All inputs use a $1,000 purchase price for pedagogical clarity. The output updates in real time.
75%
$250M= Purchase × (1 − Debt%)
$750M= Purchase × Debt%
50%
$0M
$1,500M= Purchase × (1 + Growth)
8.0%
Equity Outcome (Year 5 Exit)
24.6%
IRR
3.00x
MOIC
$750M
Equity Out
$250M
Debt at Exit
Equity Value Bridge — Where Did the Return Come From?

Three Key Insights

1
Debt Repayment ≡ EV Growth (when leverage is fixed)
Scenarios I and II produce identical IRRs (24.6%). Both convert $500 of "value creation" into $750 of equity at exit. The mechanism doesn't matter — what matters is that some mechanism moves value from debt-holders or operations to equity-holders. This is the core economic argument for PE: there are two paths to alpha, and most deals blend both.
2
Leverage Amplifies, Doesn't Create
Scenarios III and IV operate on the same $500 EV growth, but produce IRRs of 14.9% vs 28.3% — a 13.4-point spread purely from the capital structure choice. Higher leverage amplifies both upside and downside. Try Scenario IV with negative EV growth (slide left) — the IRR turns sharply negative. This is the symmetry PE sponsors live with.
3
Interest Eats Cash Flow
In Scenario IV (75% debt), 8% interest on $750 = $60/year — nearly the entire gross FCF. So even though leverage is higher, less debt actually gets repaid because most operating cash flow goes to interest expense. The cumulative FCF drops from $250 (Scenario III) to ~$118 (Scenario IV). This is why "covenant-lite" loose-amort structures became popular post-2010: PE sponsors learned that aggressive debt amortization can starve growth investment.